#15071: Make it easy to have automatic numerical evaluation of symbolic
functions
on inexact input
-------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by benjaminfjones):
Ok, makes sense. Thanks for doing the separation.
I looked in detail at your latest patch and it looks good. One thing I'd
like to see before it's merged is more test coverage. It looks like only
the `len(args) == 1` branch is tested right now. We should include tests
of the multiple argument case and also the case of multiple arguments with
distinct parents. Of course, once we have symbolic functions that use this
`_eval_default` the toy test classes like you've included won't be
necessary.
After that, I'd say this is good to go.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15071#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
