#14261: Iwahori-Hecke algebra with several bases
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  brant              |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-5.12
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Iwahori Hecke      |    Merged in:
  algebra                            |    Reviewers:  Andrew Mathas, Brant
        Authors:  Brant Jones,       |  Jones, Travis Scrimshaw
  Travis Scrimshaw                   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #13735 #14014      |
  #14678 #14516                      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:40 andrew.mathas]:
 > Unfortunatey, having user supplied bar involution isn't going to
 > work here. For example, it makes perfect sense to talk about the
 > Kazhdan-Lusztig bases of the group ring `ZW` (by specialisation) BUT
 > you can can't define an appropriate bar involution on `ZW`. The
 > point is that you can't detect the KL-bases inside `ZW`: to find
 > them you have to work generically and then specialise -- that is,
 > you have to work in a completely different (but related) algebra to
 > define these bases.

 Yes, that's what I meant above by "when it makes sense". When it does
 not you certainly have to go through generic/specialization.

 My point is that, when it makes sense, it could be worthwhile making
 explicit (and customizable!) what the involution on the ground field
 does. In particular for potential use cases where the bar involution
 on the ground field is non trivial. In which case the user could
 provide an implementation of it to bypass the generic/specialization
 process.

 Cheers,
                     Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14261#comment:44>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to