#14261: Iwahori-Hecke algebra with several bases
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  brant              |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-5.12
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Iwahori Hecke      |    Merged in:
  algebra                            |    Reviewers:  Andrew Mathas, Brant
        Authors:  Brant Jones,       |  Jones, Travis Scrimshaw
  Travis Scrimshaw                   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #13735 #14014      |
  #14678 #14516                      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:46 andrew.mathas]:
 > '''Default parameters for the Hecke algebras'''
 >
 > We are implementing Hecke algebras with two parameters `q1` and `q2`.
 Should the corresponding quadratic relations be
 > {{{
 > (T_r-q1)(T_r-q2)=0,
 > }}}
 > as we currently have it, or should they be
 > {{{
 > (T_r-q1)(T_r+q2)=0?
 > }}}
 > There are advantages and disadvantages with both choices. I don't really
 care either way, but I thought that the question should be at least asked
 because the three "most common" choices for relations are:
 > {{{
 > (T_r-q)(T_r+1)=0           # Iwahori's original defintiion
 > (T_r-q)(T_r+q^-1)=0        # the best normalistion
 > (T_r-1)(T_r+1)=0           # the group ring of the Coxeter group
 > }}}
 > All of these are arguably more compatible with the second choice.
 >
 > If no one has a strong preference either way then I will leave it as it
 is (choice 1).

 Unsurprisingly, choice 1 is my preferred. It makes their description easy
 and symmetric: the two eigenvalues of the T's.

 Thanks!

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14261#comment:47>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to