#14261: Iwahori-Hecke algebra with several bases
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  brant              |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Iwahori Hecke      |    Merged in:
  algebra                            |    Reviewers:  Andrew Mathas, Brant
        Authors:  Brant Jones,       |  Jones, Travis Scrimshaw
  Travis Scrimshaw, Andrew Mathas    |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #13735 #14014      |
  #14678 #14516                      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by andrew.mathas):

 A new review patch is attached (and on the queue). It fixes some errors
 (which I may have introduced) in the documentation and some issues with
 `nil_coxeter_algebra` and `new_kschur` due to the new calling syntax and
 new output.

 **Brant:** Could you please check the documentation for (mathematical)
 errors? I just fixed quite a few about the KL-bases, but it is likely that
 I missed some and not unlikely that I created others. As you are more
 familiar with the area than Travis it will be much easier for you to spot
 mistakes.

 **Travis:** There is an error i the documentation on line 185:
 {{{
 :meth:`bar involution
 <IwahoriHeckeAlgebra._BasesCategory.ElementMethods.bar>`
 }}}
 The `bar involution` should presumably be a link to the corresponding
 method but the link i not showing up. I haven't seen this syntax before so
 I'm not sure of the best way to fix it. Could you please have a look?

 I'm fairly happy with the patch now. As we (Brant, Travis and I) are now
 all listed as authors what is the protocol for giving this a positive
 review? Can we just agree amongst ourselves or should be lean on some one?

 Andrew

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14261#comment:66>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to