#15299: Incorrect results for analytic Sha due to low precision
-----------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect           |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major            |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  elliptic curves  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                   |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A              |  Work issues:
         Branch:                   |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                   |     Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by cremona):

 Replying to [comment:3 jdemeyer]:
 > So this is plain wrong then (I don't know enough mathematics to judge
 this):
 > {{{
 >         if self.__E.root_number() == 1:
 >             return 0
 > }}}
 The root number is the sign of the functional equation so is +1 for even
 analytic rank and -1 for odd.  This function computes the first
 derivative.  *In practice* this is something one would only want to do if
 the 0'th derivative was already known to be 0, in which case the code you
 quote would be OK since if the value is 0 and the order is even then the
 order is at least 2 so the first derivative is exactly 0.  But of course
 this function then lies in wait for the user who decides they want the
 first derivative's value even when the value is nonzero (as for 11a1).
 The trouble is that (1) Formulas for the r'th derivative which are
 implemented are *only* valid under the assumption that all previous
 derivatives are 0;  and of course (2) proving the earlier derivatives are
 exactly 0 is usually impossible with current theory.

 Where does that leave this deriv_at1 function?  At the very least it
 should come with a huge warning about all this.  And it really should
 return 0 when the root number is +1 unless the user has made an explicit
 assumption (assume_order_of_vanishing_is_positive=True, say) and otherwise
 raise a NotImplemented error (or attempt to prove that L(1)=0).

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15299#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to