#13413: fix integer overflow (?) in conversion of powersums to Schur functions
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: saliola | Owner: sage-
Type: defect | combinat
Priority: critical | Status:
Component: combinatorics | needs_review
Keywords: symmetric functions, | Milestone: sage-5.13
symmetrica, memleak | Resolution:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Merged in:
Report Upstream: Reported upstream. No | Reviewers:
feedback yet. | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by zabrocki):
The version you just posted seems to compile (I was having issues before)
but it looks like the fix only solves 1/2 of the problem.
{{{
sage: s = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).s()
sage: p = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).p()
sage: g = s(p([1]*36))
sage: g.coefficient([7,6,5,4,3,3,2,2,1,1,1,1])
12961662907729536000
sage: g = s(p([1]*47))
sage: s(p[2,2])
s[1, 1, 1, 1] - s[2, 1, 1] + 1589352607*s[2, 2] - s[3, 1] + s[4]
}}}
Are you getting similar results? We may have to go back to the drawing
board.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13413#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.