#13413: fix integer overflow (?) in conversion of powersums to Schur functions
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: saliola | Owner: sage-
Type: defect | combinat
Priority: critical | Status:
Component: combinatorics | needs_review
Keywords: symmetric functions, | Milestone: sage-5.13
symmetrica, memleak | Resolution:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Merged in:
Report Upstream: Reported upstream. No | Reviewers:
feedback yet. | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by zabrocki):
On two different macs am getting:
{{{
sage: s = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).s()
sage: p = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).p()
sage: sage: g = s(p([1]*47))
sage: g.coefficient([9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,2,1])
14333651730948448927581696000
sage: sage: g = s(p([1]*47))
sage: g.coefficient([9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,2,1])
6813423452539470910666189837844044800
}}}
The first time the value is computed it seems to be correct. The second
time it is random. This does not happen on linux.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13413#comment:46>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.