#13771: Canonical Forms and Automorphism Groups of linear codes
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: tfeulner | Owner: wdj
Type: enhancement | Status:
Priority: major | needs_review
Component: coding theory | Milestone: sage-5.13
Keywords: linear code, canonical form, | Resolution:
automorphism group, semilinear equivalent | Merged in:
Authors: Thomas Feulner | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #13726 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Could you explain what
{{{
Finally, it can also deal with the action of subgroups of the semimonomial
group.
}}}
means? E.g. can you find the canonical form which does not take the ring
automorphisms into account? (This would be natural is some settings, I
suppose).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13771#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
