#13771: Canonical Forms and Automorphism Groups of linear codes
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: tfeulner | Owner: wdj
Type: enhancement | Status:
Priority: major | needs_review
Component: coding theory | Milestone: sage-5.13
Keywords: linear code, canonical form, | Resolution:
automorphism group, semilinear equivalent | Merged in:
Authors: Thomas Feulner | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #13726 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
My point with the `automorphism_group` was mainly that its bad to make
backwards-incompatible changes. If we implement the various subgroups
properly then we would want to return the actual group and not a pair
(generators, order). Its perfectly fine to leave that for future work, of
course. How about we call it `automorphism_group_gens` or something like
that, then we can in the future implement `automorphism_group` returning
an actual group.
Apart from that looks good... Dima, did you take a look at the code?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13771#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
