#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: stumpc5
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream: N/A | Chapoton
Branch: | Work issues:
Dependencies: #11224, #8327, | Commit:
#10193, #12895, #14516, #14722, | Stopgaps:
#13589, #14471, #15069, #15094, |
#11688 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
All long tests passed for me on 5.12.beta1, except for one of those random
failures:
{{{
sage -t --long devel/sage/sage/schemes/toric/weierstrass_covering.py
**********************************************************************
File "devel/sage/sage/schemes/toric/weierstrass_covering.py", line 72, in
sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass_covering
Failed example:
P2_112 = toric_varieties.P2_112()
Expected nothing
Got:
Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while
calling a Python object' in <function remove at 0x194e398> ignored
}}}
As for the patchbot failure, it's due to a wrong order in the application
of the patches. Someone knows how to fix this?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:135>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
