#15506: Fix another "recursion depth exceeded" in memory deallocation for weak
dictionaries
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: performance | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/nbruin/ticket/15506 | e23ec990e914edea0cff655ff188716279b33afc
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:6 nbruin]:
> Replying to [comment:5 nthiery]:
> > Is there a reason for not putting the above code that verifies the
solution as a doctest?
> No, if you want to add a doctest, go ahead.
> > Backport this ticket and its dependencies to mercurial, or move #10963
to git?
> I have no preference. Given that you'd have to backport #15367 as well,
I think you'd better bite the bullet and go with git.
I am fine with both, as long as it goes quickly. Volker, Jeroen, what do
you think from a release management point of view?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15506#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
