#13917: IndependentSets class
---------------------------------+----------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen         |        Owner:  jason, ncohen, rlm
           Type:  enhancement    |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major          |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  graph theory   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                 |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen  |    Reviewers:  ahmorales
Report Upstream:  N/A            |  Work issues:
         Branch:                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #14589         |     Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+----------------------------------
Description changed by ncohen:

Old description:

> I'm rather disappointed by this patch. Or I'm pleasantly surprised by
> Python, I don't know. I expected a much better speedup.
>
> {{{
> sage: g = graphs.RandomGNP(50,.7)
> sage: import networkx
> sage: gn = g.networkx_graph()
> sage: %timeit list(networkx.find_cliques(gn))
> 10 loops, best of 3: 48.8 ms per loop
> sage: from sage.graphs.independent_sets import IndependentSets
> sage: %timeit list(IndependentSets(g,complement=True, maximal = True))
> 10 loops, best of 3: 20.8 ms per loop
> sage: %timeit IndependentSets(g,complement=True, maximal =
> True).cardinality()
> 100 loops, best of 3: 19 ms per loop
> }}}
>
> Either way, this patch implements a `sage.graphs.independent_set` module
> that can list/count (possibly maximal) independent sets.
>
> Anyway, don't hesitate to tell me that this patch is useless if you feel
> like it. I'm not *that* convinced either.
>
> Nathann
>
> Apply:
>
> * [attachment:trac_13917-v2.patch]
> * [attachment:trac_13917-v2-more_doc.patch]
> * [attachment:trac_13917-doctests.patch]

New description:

 I'm rather disappointed by this patch. Or I'm pleasantly surprised by
 Python, I don't know. I expected a much better speedup.

 {{{
 sage: g = graphs.RandomGNP(50,.7)
 sage: import networkx
 sage: gn = g.networkx_graph()
 sage: %timeit list(networkx.find_cliques(gn))
 10 loops, best of 3: 48.8 ms per loop
 sage: from sage.graphs.independent_sets import IndependentSets
 sage: %timeit list(IndependentSets(g,complement=True, maximal = True))
 10 loops, best of 3: 20.8 ms per loop
 sage: %timeit IndependentSets(g,complement=True, maximal =
 True).cardinality()
 100 loops, best of 3: 19 ms per loop
 }}}

 Either way, this patch implements a `sage.graphs.independent_set` module
 that can list/count (possibly maximal) independent sets. While right now
 we can only compute the maximal ones.

 Nathann

 Apply:

 * [attachment:trac_13917-v2.patch]
 * [attachment:trac_13917-v2-more_doc.patch]
 * [attachment:trac_13917-doctests.patch]

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13917#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to