#14711: Weak references in the coercion graph
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jpflori | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: memleak, number | Merged in:
field, QuadraticField | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 37bf59eac24eda1ece89aff7dde4a1db5d0cbb5c
u/SimonKing/ticket/14711 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:158 mmezzarobba]:
> It looks like there has already been plenty of discussion about this
branch, and stupid merge conflicts with `develop` accumulate while it is
waiting for review. Could someone please clarify which parts of the
changes still need review?
Actually I don't know. Nils?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14711#comment:164>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
