#15223: Let the `TestSuite` test that the construction of a parent returns the
parent
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  coercion           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  construction       |    Merged in:
  functor, test suite, sd53          |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Simon King         |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  cb4929aa68113ebdfe4e471a014f4621e42cdba7
  u/SimonKing/ticket/15223           |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #15229             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Reviewing the errors:
 {{{
 sage -t src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
 **********************************************************************
 File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx", line 476, in
 sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomialRing.construction
 Failed example:
     P.<x0, x1, x2, x3> =
 BooleanPolynomialRing(4,order='degrevlex(2),degrevlex(2)')
 Expected nothing
 Got:
     doctest:1: DeprecationWarning: using 'degrevlex' in Boolean polynomial
 rings is deprecated. If needed, reverse the order of variables manually
 and use 'degneglex'
     See http://trac.sagemath.org/13849 for details.
 **********************************************************************
 }}}
 OK, it seems we need a different ordering. Mostly harmless

 `sage -t src/sage/rings/residue_field.pyx` and `sage -t
 src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_pari_ffelt.py`: The new test
 fails on some examples. Hooray! The new test helped to detect another bug!

 For me, `sage -t src/sage/rings/finite_rings/integer_mod_ring.py` passes
 without error.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15223#comment:30>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to