#14165: Computing number fields as subfields of algebraic field.
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mmarco | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: | Status: needs_review
enhancement | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: number | Merged in:
fields | Reviewers:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
Dependencies: |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by mmarco):
The only thing that my patch adds to the existing function is the
possibility to choose the name of the generator. As far as i am concerned,
it would be ok to close this ticket as wontfix, and, if somebody considers
that the name of the generator is important, open a ticket to add that
option to the existing function.
Anyways, i would like to run some tests to compare my code with the
existing one. Most likely my code will be worse, but it would be worth to
check it, just in case.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14165#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
