#11905: Remove _splitting_field() from elliptic curves
-----------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: cremona
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: elliptic curves | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #11904, #11995, #2217 | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Jeroen Demeyer', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* author: => Jeroen Demeyer
Old description:
> `sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/gal_reps.py` has code to compute a
> splitting field, but that clearly does not belong to elliptic curves. We
> should use the new `splitting_field()` function from #2217.
>
> We should make it work also over number fields and think about
> efficiency.
New description:
`sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/gal_reps.py` has code to compute a splitting
field, but that clearly does not belong to elliptic curves. We should use
the new `splitting_field()` function from #2217.
We should make it work also over number fields and think about efficiency.
'''branch meant for author use only, history will likely be rewritten'''
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11905#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
