#15663: Fix wrong claim about Suter's paper
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: partitions, suter
Merged in: | slides
Reviewers: | Authors: Darij Grinberg
Work issues: | Report Upstream: N/A
Commit: | Branch:
ca3ed673893e78ac6ac77aa39675654c6a98d2d8| public/combinat/partitions/suter
Stopgaps: | Dependencies:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
I accidentally misunderstood one of the two definitions of Suter slides in
his paper and claimed in the docstring that it would conflict with the
other. My apologies for that!
This branch merges cleanly with my other partitions.py branch (#15428).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15663>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
