#15663: Fix wrong claim about Suter's paper
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: partitions, suter | Merged in:
slides | Reviewers:
Authors: Darij Grinberg | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | ca3ed673893e78ac6ac77aa39675654c6a98d2d8
public/combinat/partitions/suter | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by darij:
Old description:
> I accidentally misunderstood one of the two definitions of Suter slides
> in his paper and claimed in the docstring that it would conflict with the
> other. My apologies for that!
>
> This branch merges cleanly with my other partitions.py branch (#15428).
New description:
I accidentally misunderstood one of the two definitions of Suter slides in
his paper and claimed in the docstring that it would conflict with the
other. My apologies for that!
I've also modified the doc of `dominated_partitions` to reflect what the
code does. Could have done it the other way round but this sounds more
natural.
This branch merges cleanly with my other partitions.py branch (#15428).
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15663#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
