#2686: graph generators - new additions
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: rlm | Owner: rlm
Type: | Status: needs_info
enhancement | Milestone: sage-6.1
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: graph | Merged in:
theory | Reviewers:
Keywords: | Work issues:
graphs | Commit:
Authors: | 46e590a91ffb1f2a32354b202738799cf8399b29
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
public/2686 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hellooooooo !
> * with some more work, one can maybe avoid creating duplicate vertices.
I will not have time to do that soon.
Well.. It's a bit slow but it isn't really the kind of function that is
called very often in a code `:-P`
> * for the name, one could maybe use SixHundredCell and
OneHundredTwentyCell (like they do in some other very expensive stuff
named `M*********a`)
Tastes... Honestly I think that `Cell<n>` is still easier to find. Plus
you cannot build `Cell600` without learning that `Cell120` is implemented
too.
> * I have never heard of the 200-cell before. One should look for
references.
Well even the 600 was news to me `:-P`
> * One still has to make sure that nothing else useful is still hidden
there
In the code ? I just looked at the functions and it looks like we already
have all that is contained there.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2686#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
