#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  stumpc5
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry  |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Chapoton
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:
  public/ticket/10963                |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #11224, #8327,     |  eb7b486c6fecac296052f980788e15e2ad1b59e4
  #10193, #12895, #14516, #14722,    |     Stopgaps:
  #13589, #14471, #15069, #15094,    |
  #11688, #13394, #15150, #15506     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:440 nthiery]:
 > Replying to [comment:426 vbraun]:
 > > I also think that the code on this ticket suffers from a lot of abuse
 of lazy imports. They are a useful tool, but they don't absolve you from
 thinking about import order of modules.
 >
 > Quite on the contrary, the code is being thoughtfully specific about
 > import order. It's being explicit that, e.g., the Magmas category can
 > be imported and is fully functional without importing
 > Magmas.Associative (i.e. Semigroups). On the other hand, importing
 > Semigroups really requires importing Magmas before hand.

 +1 (see my reply to Volker in comment:428.

 > > You are deliberately omitting the other half of the story: If you have
 two unrelated classes `C` and `D` then `C.a` and `D.a` are unrelated in
 Python. And you are breaking that.
 >
 > No, I am not!

 Let's see if you give the same arguments that I gave in
 comment:428... readingreadingreadin --- Yes, you do, so +1 `:-)`

 > Ok, off for lunch!

 Bon appetit !

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:441>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to