#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  stumpc5
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry  |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Chapoton
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:
  public/ticket/10963                |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #11224, #8327,     |  eb7b486c6fecac296052f980788e15e2ad1b59e4
  #10193, #12895, #14516, #14722,    |     Stopgaps:
  #13589, #14471, #15069, #15094,    |
  #11688, #13394, #15150, #15506     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:453 SimonKing]:
 > Here is the announced example. Since Nicolas did not post here, I do.

 Thanks Simon!

 > But it is his example.

 Or more precisely, my implementation of your example :-)

 > (which of course must be well documented)

 There is a (not yet completely finalized) section about this in the
 documentation of axioms now (see Deduction Rules). Let me know if it's
 good enough.

 Speaking of which: I have just pushed my work of the day. The join
 algorithm is described
 and partially formalized; however its companion _with_axiom is yet to
 be done and they work hand in hand. Yet this should give some hints
 about why it works.

 This gave me the occasion to look back at the code, and I did some
 small simplifications; mostly clearing out a couple small features of
 the join method that were needed at some point and not anymore.

 Pushed on u/nthiery/ticket/10963; doc recompiled on sagemath.

 Cheers,
                      Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:454>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to