#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  stumpc5
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry  |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Chapoton
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:
  public/ticket/10963                |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #11224, #8327,     |  eb7b486c6fecac296052f980788e15e2ad1b59e4
  #10193, #12895, #14516, #14722,    |     Stopgaps:
  #13589, #14471, #15069, #15094,    |
  #11688, #13394, #15150, #15506     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:461 ncohen]:
 > It looks like your problem is that the user should "decide" if the
 function is a function of `A.B` or a function of `B.A` when what you have
 in mind is a function of `{A,B}`. Why don't you have a syntax which takes
 as information a set of axioms (and a category if needed), and let some
 code decide automatically where it should be put (pick your spanning tree)
 ?

 How could such syntax look like? Of course, we can have a separate class
 `ABs`, and then let both `As.B` and `Bs.A` point to it. But even when you
 write down the name `ABs`, you already have a choice to do---after all,
 why don't you chose `BAs` instead of `ABs`.

 > Something like the fancy stuff you like, a metaclass which creates a
 class from its SET of axioms, and everything ?

 Well, this is my suggestion for the future.

 > P.S. : A "spanning tree" in a dag is usually not called a spanning tree
 but a spanning out-arborescence. We just don't like "trees" to be directed
 `:-P`

 Really? I always thought of ''rooted'' trees (and that's what we have
 here) as being directed.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:462>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to