#15735: Add somewhatfptufvs package
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: spurtuna | Owner: spurtuna
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Resolution:
Keywords: graph,hard,feedback vertex | Merged in:
set | Reviewers:
Authors: spurtuna | Work issues:
Report Upstream: None of the above - read trac | Commit:
for reasoning. | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
Dependencies: None |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by spurtuna):
I might have jumped through a few hoops as I sent things all over the
place, in hopes that something would stick. And apparently something has,
as I still write here.
The code you ask for can be seen at
http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/diff/src/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py?h=u/spurtuna/15735please&id=63a66f69969a05669f8522183bf408a930629697
Something that works for me is[[BR]]
$ git init[[BR]]
$ git pull git://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git u/spurtuna/15735please[[BR]]
So no, the archive has nothing to do with sage. I have no idea of how much
work it is to maintain a branch so that it has a head. (Also whether
previous sentence make sense for that matter.) When writing my 'Readme', I
was mainly concerned with regards to the survival of the package without a
context. Won't claim this is an original concern. Would not be surprised,
if others have already had this concern. I guess what I am trying to say
is that I did not stumble on this project on my own.
[[BR]]
[[BR]]
The changes I made to sage are mostly so that people can play with this
package. I am however unsure on what might be a good way to precede,
getting what I have pushed on git to at some extent achieve
*readily accessible though notebook[[BR]]
*becoming an experimental, optional or standard package[[BR]]
One of the more pressing todo's are with regards to a condition based on
the method weighted(), even though it is gibberish due to context.
[[BR]]
[[BR]]
I will get rid of what makes it currently C++11 only. Another archive
somewhatfptufvs-0.9.tar.5.bz2 then. I would have made it C++03 sooner or
later anyway. Will look less like C and more like C++ afterwards.
I currently use [[BR]]
$ ./sage -i [[BR]]
or rather[[BR]]
$ ./sage -sh sage-fix-pkg-checksums && ./sage -f somewhatfptufvs &&
make[[BR]]
Yes, I like the goal of getting it working for more people.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15735#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
