#12630: Add representations of quivers and quiver algebras to sage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: JStarx | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: algebra, quiver, | Merged in:
module, days49 | Reviewers: Simon King
Authors: Jim Stark, Simon | Work issues:
King, Mathieu Guay-Paquet, Aladin | Commit:
Virmaux | 72fb2eb71459f4ac76b0d922a7ad788c660a8017
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/SimonKing/ticket/12630 |
Dependencies: #12412, #12413, |
#14806, #15491, #15623 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> Right. Spoiling the `all_paths_iterator` method with an optional
argument would be an option. The `all_paths` method wouldn't be touched,
then.
Yepyep. And I will do something about this `all_paths` thing which should
be an iterator.
> But I somehow don't like that solution. `all_paths_iterator` would have
two combined flavours: arrow-paths versus vertex-paths, and simple versus
self-intersecting.
Well... That's the kind of stuff that happens at Python-level... An entry
point to many different algorithms. Plus what about multiple edges and
simple graphs ? This will have to appear in the code too `:-P`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12630#comment:185>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
