#15840: Residues in SymbolicRing
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers: Marc Mezzarobba
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dkrenn/ticket/15840 | 511b9ff92b50bb84b9673556ccc6aa879bfa9e93
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by dkrenn):
* commit: ae62ecaa973952ef96268e697d6525ba5512d307 =>
511b9ff92b50bb84b9673556ccc6aa879bfa9e93
Comment:
Replying to [comment:8 mmezzarobba]:
> Also, I wonder if we shouldn't prefer a syntax such as
`expr.residue(x==a)` for consistency with `series()`.
Yes, good idea. I changed that.
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=511b9ff92b50bb84b9673556ccc6aa879bfa9e93
511b9ff]||{{{changed to support x==a syntax for consistency with
.series()}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15840#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
