#15852: make Sequence a FiniteEnumeratedSets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Ralf Stephan | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/rws/ticket/15852 | c0f4cf53bd33fa88e375a632454a81ce1954a4e1
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* cc: nthiery (added)
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
While having the category of sequences also being the parent is a definite
abuse IMO, I don't like the proposed change since:
- it returns a class rather than an instance, and
- it isn't a container for only finite sequences.
So I would rather see a new class as you propose here with this ticket.
Let's do things properly, and the parent shouldn't be too big or
complicated either. This parent will also be in the category of `Sets` or
`InfiniteEnumeratedSets` depending on if the base object is enumerable or
not.
Also what's the ticket that removes the `Sequences` category? I'd almost
say do that here as well.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15852#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.