#15852: make Sequence a FiniteEnumeratedSets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Ralf Stephan | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/rws/ticket/15852 | c0f4cf53bd33fa88e375a632454a81ce1954a4e1
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by rws):
Replying to [comment:4 tscrim]:
> So I would rather see a new class as you propose here with this ticket.
Let's do things properly, and the parent shouldn't be too big or
complicated either. This parent will also be in the category of `Sets` or
`InfiniteEnumeratedSets` depending on if the base object is enumerable or
not.
In my understandig a sequence is always enumerable, it may not be finite,
or it may not be mutable. The present `class Sequence` is finite and can
optionally be immutable so the right category would be
`FiniteEnumeratedSets` instead of `Sets`. Yes the infinite version is
desirable but please not in this ticket, too.
> Also what's the ticket that removes the `Sequences` category? I'd almost
say do that here as well.
#15853 and we have it now so use it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15852#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
