#14711: Weak references in the coercion graph
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jpflori | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: memleak, number | Merged in:
field, QuadraticField | Reviewers: Jean-Pierre Flori
Authors: Simon King | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 7d7f7ae03d3fd16e630c69fa863f9ce8e1ac01e3
u/jpflori/ticket/14711 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jpflori):
There are still a huge of number of failures, a lot of them in the number
field stuff.
I've double checked and these are not present in the old
`u/SimonKing/ticket/14711` branch.
So it must be that something about number field or coercion has changed in
other tickets since the original development of this ticket.
The current trac/master seems (mostly) fine.
So it's between trac/master (6.1.1) and trac/develop (6.2.beta2).
Or not, as I've just tested every tag up to 6.2.beta2 on top of
`u/SimonKing/ticket/14711` without problems.
I've resolved conflicts in a slightly different way so it might be the
reason behind the different behaviors.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14711#comment:191>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
