#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  stumpc5
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry  |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Chapoton
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:
  public/ticket/10963-doc-           |       Commit:
  distributive                       |  7ab3103368e46d33f37e135a9eb09a1e16a029a7
   Dependencies:  #11224, #8327,     |     Stopgaps:
  #10193, #12895, #14516, #14722,    |
  #13589, #14471, #15069, #15094,    |
  #11688, #13394, #15150, #15506,    |
  #15757, #15759                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Hi Travis!

 Replying to [comment:542 tscrim]:
 > <rant>Nested classes have always been a problem to/for me. In Java, one
 can get performance problems via private access. I tried doing nested-
 classes in C++ with templates once and I couldn't get it to work. After
 looking into the STL, for example an iterator, they create the iterator
 outside of the container class, but have it referenced by the container
 class.</rant> In python, there's some technical things I'm not fully
 versed in, but it seems to be okay...at least to one level deep.

 Yeah, nested classes did not go without their issues in Python too,
 but it was essentially in the various support tools (pickling,
 documentation) which had not yet been shaken out enough by intensive
 use. Most of the issues have been fixed or reasonably worked around at
 the beginning of categories (#9107 being an exception, but it's almost
 done too).

 > PS - Nicolas, you numbering is off `:p`

 Oops. Thanks for the notice! Fixed.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:544>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to