#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: stumpc5
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: days54 | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream: N/A | Chapoton
Branch: | Work issues:
public/ticket/10963-doc- | Commit:
distributive | 977a940beba7ed96722a24e36cd81595336350ef
Dependencies: #11224, #8327, | Stopgaps:
#10193, #12895, #14516, #14722, |
#13589, #14471, #15069, #15094, |
#11688, #13394, #15150, #15506, |
#15757, #15759 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> Certainly. Now, when it comes to be an advocate of users, one thing to
> consider is who around here has accumulated the most experience using,
> implementing, teaching, and helping others use and implement
> categories and axioms.
I don't trust the combinat/ code. There are bad designs choices in there
from time to time, and known bugs are not always fixed. You cannot ask us
to accept that the choices you made are good just because they have been
made a long time ago. If you think that those design choices are good,
then you have years of examples in mind that you can use to illustrate it.
But you have to illustrate it. That's why we review code, and don't just
blindly trust the author.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:552>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
