#15593: sqlalchemy and gdmodule should not be standard packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ohanar | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: R. Andrew Ohana | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | d701c15354193da3ba02762ca61e6763a74b6b40
u/ohanar/optionalize | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Since I need sqlalchemy (or at least *some* database), I'll not review it.
Just some questions: Is there the plan to turn the current standard
sqlalchemy spkg into an optional one? Will the current standard spkg
(version 0.5.8) be upgraded when being made an optional spkg (version
0.9.3)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15593#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
