#15593: sqlalchemy and gdmodule should not be standard packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ohanar | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: R. Andrew Ohana | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | d701c15354193da3ba02762ca61e6763a74b6b40
u/ohanar/optionalize | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ohanar):
Replying to [comment:7 SimonKing]:
> Since I need sqlalchemy (or at least *some* database), I'll not review
it. Just some questions: Is there the plan to turn the current standard
sqlalchemy spkg into an optional one? Will the current standard spkg
(version 0.5.8) be upgraded when being made an optional spkg (version
0.9.3)?
I've not removed sqlalchemy from the repository, so it will remain as an
optional spkg (although not upgraded, probably a trivial upgrade though).
sqlalchemy is not a database, but rather a wrapper for sql databases to
give them a unified interface. We currently ship sqlite as our database of
choice.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15593#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
