#16030: Use "git trac" in the developer guide
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  documentation      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Volker Braun       |    Reviewers:  Ralf Stephan
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vbraun/use__git_trac__in_the_developer_guide|  
49ee6a57ca0520b8b279bc185b3410056dcdc747
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > I've worked on the dev scripts a lot myself, so if anything I'm
 dismissing my work.
 Fair enough, I suspected this.
 >Also, we had a quick informal survey at the last sage days and most
 developers don't use the dev scripts. And if so mostly for the feature to
 import old patches. So realistically the dev scripts won't be maintained
 or improved. And there are some really annoying bugs in them that imho
 already make the initial setup already more painful than just installing
 git (which is nowadays installed by default in most distros and part of
 XCode).
 >
 > Of course if you want to further work on the dev scripts then thats fine
 with me. And/or post to sage-devel to get a discussion going about our
 roadmap...
 It's not so much about further work, as making sure there is SOME low bar
 to entry.   I'm not worried about current developers; hardly any of them
 were using `hg_sage` toward the end either, but there are always people
 who need that level of entry.  "Every user a developer" is more what I'm
 thinking, even though of course that is never true in practice.   If "git
 trac" ends up being very easy to use, that's fine; the current
 instructions on this ticket looked rather overwhelming, but perhaps
 reorganization of that section would change that impression?

 With that in mind, before I open a discussion, I guess I'm curious what
 your roadmap actually is.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16030#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to