#15300: Weyl and Clifford Algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: days54 | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/algebras/weyl_clifford-15300| a6a7206f3de8240b9783b8464c55f1ccb1d6cb4b
Dependencies: #16037 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Replying to [comment:58 jhpalmieri]:
> It seems like it would be better to fix `repr_lincomb` than to add new
code which reproduces a lot of its functionality. How should a user decide
which of these to use, if they're both available? But maybe I'm missing
something.
I haven't checked to see how many doctests would need to be fixed, but I
was worried it was a lot. I'll look into it.
> I meant the honest center. For exterior algebras, this is easy: it's the
evenly graded part. For Clifford algebras, these are finite dimensional,
so what happens if you try to solve the linear algebra problem (find all
solutions to `[x,-]=0` for all generators `x`)? You could try to do the
same with the supercenter.
Ack, you're right. I really shouldn't try to do math in my head late at
night. I'll work the centers into this ticket as well.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15300#comment:59>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
