#6637: standardize the interface to TransitiveIdeal and friends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  mhansen
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  backtrack,         |    Merged in:
  enumerated set, transitive         |    Reviewers:
  closure                            |  Work issues:
        Authors:                     |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  52ce4a357d72762caf3339fe0282a0364e15a842
         Branch:  u/slabbe/6637      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #14052             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by git):

 * commit:  94a4d7aaa77bfc48894d17d5242d324c3e798307 =>
     52ce4a357d72762caf3339fe0282a0364e15a842


Comment:

 Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=52ce4a357d72762caf3339fe0282a0364e15a842
 52ce4a3]||{{{succ -> successors, fixed doctests in backtrack.py}}}||

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6637#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to