#6637: standardize the interface to TransitiveIdeal and friends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: mhansen
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: backtrack, | Merged in:
enumerated set, transitive | Reviewers:
closure | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 52ce4a357d72762caf3339fe0282a0364e15a842
Branch: u/slabbe/6637 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #14052 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
I think I will stop now. The next thing to do would be to move code from
{{{sage/combinat/backtrack.py}}} to
{{{sage/sets/recursively_enumerated_set.py}}} more precisely, the
!SearchForest code. But since it is mostly about moving code (does not
change any functionality), I suggest to do it in a another ticket and
review/merge this ticket now.
Needs review!
Sébastien
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6637#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
