#15003: calling factorials of RIF
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: factorial RIF | Merged in:
RealIntervalField calling | Reviewers: Ralf Stephan
inconsistent beginner | Work issues:
Authors: amitjamadagni | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | fac03faa1b344513c0242b6f3e3c0022809fbe34
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/rws/ticket/15003 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'amitjamadagni', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* commit: 217ec553285573cc342cf44e6620297e22533e19 =>
fac03faa1b344513c0242b6f3e3c0022809fbe34
* reviewer: => Ralf Stephan
* author: => amitjamadagni
Comment:
Replying to [comment:15 ppurka]:
> But don't try to modify the main factorial function right now. It is
unclear to me at least what is the right thing to do here.
Well, as that's still unclear it would not hurt to implement at least the
`RIF` member function. I rebased the branch on 6.2.beta7.
Please open a ticket for the refactoring of
`functions/other.py:factorial()` if you think it necessary.
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=fac03faa1b344513c0242b6f3e3c0022809fbe34
fac03fa]||{{{Merge branch 'develop' into t/15003/ticket/15003}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15003#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
