#15431: Transversal Design TD(6,12)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.2
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | b3cabbe8b9d73d0797cfdfe3264c33c58ca4b4a3
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/15431 |
Dependencies: |
#15287 #15368 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
I let you do what you want with the implementation but I am still unhappy
with the documentation:
- Reading the definition, I do not understand where `lambda` comes from
(in both bibd and td)
- In `transversal_design` you do not specify whether the groups `V_i` are
disjoint or not. What is the convention? It should be said what is the
implementation in Sage (e.g. if I am using `is_transversal_design` I want
to know what I am testing).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15431#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
