#15919: Notation S[i] for i-th element of enumerated set S conflicts with
notation
R[x] for polynomial ring
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: notation, | Merged in:
algebra, polynomial | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | bbd22f1422f7b643a55afabeb44cfd8204b7dd3b
u/nthiery/ticket/15919 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by nthiery):
* commit: 2a5eaa5afc10079d97a122e50372eb19c06d390a =>
bbd22f1422f7b643a55afabeb44cfd8204b7dd3b
Comment:
Replying to [comment:9 tscrim]:
> I agree the sampling should not use `[i]` to do unranking, but should we
push that to another ticket?
+1. Let's focus here on what's needed for #10963.
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=f9b59fac8d518a946debc3555a43bdfaea4f1f90
f9b59fa]||{{{Merge branch 'develop=6.2.rc0' into ticket/15919-unrank}}}||
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=bbd22f1422f7b643a55afabeb44cfd8204b7dd3b
bbd22f1]||{{{- Use __getitem__ only on sequences and Parents not in
EnumeratedSets}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15919#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
