#15919: Notation S[i] for i-th element of enumerated set S conflicts with
notation
R[x] for polynomial ring
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: notation, | Merged in:
algebra, polynomial | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | bbd22f1422f7b643a55afabeb44cfd8204b7dd3b
u/nthiery/ticket/15919 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
(Much) More of me says this change to `InstanceTester.some_elements()` is
significantly better (and might even be faster for things that are hard to
repeatably iterate over like crystals) than loosing the possibility that
(over enough repeated tests) we get "most" elements of a very large finite
set (and without calculating `__len__()`, which also might be expensive or
error catching). So I'm saying let's make this change, the question is
where. I'd be happy doing it right here.
I'd say the problem with `ZZ` is that it is not in the correct category,
which is now #16239. I've also made some very minor doctweaks, so I'm
pos_rev with the current state (up to where to make the change above).
Best,[[BR]]
Travis
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15919#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
