#16268: Better normalization for function field elements
---------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  cremona  |        Owner:
           Type:  defect   |       Status:  new
       Priority:  minor    |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  algebra  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:           |    Merged in:
        Authors:           |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A      |  Work issues:
         Branch:           |       Commit:
   Dependencies:           |     Stopgaps:
---------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by emassop):

 The normalization would already be much better if {{{PolynomialRing(QQ,
 'u')}}} had a 'better' gcd, like the one implemented for QQ in #10771,
 which would yield {{{gcd(27*u^2+81*u+243, 27*u-81)==27}}}. However the gcd
 from flint in src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx is
 monic.

 Ku could also figure out that it is also
 {{{FractionField(PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'u'))}}}, which has a better reduce.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16268#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to