#16272: redesign transversal designs
---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: Vincent
Type: enhancement | Delecroix
Priority: major | Status: new
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Milestone: sage-6.2
Keywords: designs, orthogona arrays | Resolution:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Merged in:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Branch: | Work issues:
Dependencies: #15310, #16227 | Commit:
| Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by brett):
Replying to [comment:6 ncohen]:
> Yo !
>
> > In case "Unkown" did you mean that Sage does not know how to do it (as
currently implemented) but possibly Mathematics knows the answer?
>
> The parameter will be called "existence". When you type
{{{designs.transversal_design(k,n,existence=True)}}}
>
> it will answer
> 1) `True` meaning "Sage can build it"
> 2) `Unknown` meaning "Sage can't build it, but it may exist"
> 3) `False` meaning "it does not exist"
>
Perfect, this is what I thought, but "nor" threw me off
>
> > Why did that BibTeX reference format so badly?
>
> Because some characters that you used are interpreted as typographic
instructions. Wrap what you want to say with `{{{` and `}}}` to avoid
that. I edited your comment above, so it looks fine now `;-)`
thanks
You put it in some kind of box, a "code block"?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16272#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
