#16272: redesign transversal designs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: Vincent Delecroix
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: designs, | Merged in:
orthogona arrays | Reviewers:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/16272 | 8830bb57327e1ca370287ca60b33e6d1b790a2d3
Dependencies: #15310, #16227, | Stopgaps:
#16281 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Well, not only we don't care if some step of the total computation is not
checked, but none of them should be checked except the last one. We should
never call design constructors from inside of the library without
deacivating the checks othewise we really waste time.
Okay... Now I am going to play with git to see what exactly is being
implemented in this ticket `T_T`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16272#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
