#16296: Speed improvements for categories with axioms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cython             |    Merged in:
  performance categories             |    Reviewers:
        Authors:                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  9a420ad15fc941dfd3b3a12d005b4f814407a008
  u/SimonKing/ticket/16296           |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #10963, #15801,    |
  #16309                             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 With #16309, the documentation builds, and
 {{{
 sage: from sage.misc.sageinspect import sage_getargspec
 sage: sage_getargspec(Category.join)
 ArgSpec(args=['categories', 'as_list', 'ignore_axioms', 'axioms'],
 varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=(False, (), ()))
 }}}
 I am running tests now. However, even if they pass, I'd like to try and
 get some more speed for the `WeakValueDictionary` used in
 `sage.categories.category`, and `sage.categories.category_with_axiom`
 probably has more potential for improvements.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16296#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to