#16296: Speed improvements for categories with axioms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cython             |    Merged in:
  performance categories             |    Reviewers:
        Authors:                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  2ca07873a91cf6d5e685ed3527a314944a8fdfb9
  u/SimonKing/ticket/16296           |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #10963, #15801,    |
  #16309                             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Hi Simon!

 Thanks so much for exploring how much we could potentially gain by
 cythonizing some of the category infrastructure code; we need this
 kind of facts to take good decisions. At this point definitely +1 on
 optimizing lower level things like c3, since the interface and
 algorithms are quite final.

 On the other hand, I am wondering whether the current not so massive
 speed improvements make a compelling case for actually cythonizing the
 file category.py right now. The point is that cythonizing makes the
 code much harder to debug (I agree, this is a problem of pdb: we
 really would need to have a debugger supporting both python and cython
 code; alas I don't see progress in this direction anytime soon).

 E.g. I find the coercion code very painful to work with precisely
 because of this. In fact, when I tried to fix things a couple years
 ago, I first uncythonized it ...

 I fear that it would similarly slow down the followup development we
 want to do with categories, e.g. improving the join algorithm.

 What do you think?

 Cheers,
                                  Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16296#comment:30>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to