#6637: standardize the interface to TransitiveIdeal and friends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  mhansen
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  backtrack,         |    Merged in:
  enumerated set, transitive         |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
  closure, days57                    |  Work issues:
        Authors:  Sébastien Labbé    |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  3191690431cfe1614444004863b15a331941ad00
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  public/ticket/6637                 |
   Dependencies:  #14052             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by slabbe):

 I pushed on my
 
[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/diff/?id2=fa885d90d609c8311d8fa52deac1340cd558b5a9&id=38a82f820d5314890a34d0707851c40ea5eb5b67
 branch] a
 
[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?h=u/slabbe/6637&id=38a82f820d5314890a34d0707851c40ea5eb5b67
 commit] using metaclass. In the end, I had to create a factory def outside
 of the class...

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6637#comment:49>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to