#6637: standardize the interface to TransitiveIdeal and friends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: mhansen
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: backtrack, | Merged in:
enumerated set, transitive | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
closure, days57 | Work issues:
Authors: Sébastien Labbé | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | dd72bfc1227605362e9baf847a623ddd6bd297f9
Branch: | Stopgaps:
public/ticket/6637 |
Dependencies: #14052 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
Replying to [comment:51 tscrim]:
> Looking at your commit, I don't see any benefit in using the metaclass.
Yes exactly. I needed to play with it to understand what you meant.
> However I'm not opposed to the renaming, so I've just pushed that.
Well, the renaming was just an easy way for me to check that {{{sage -t
recursively_enumerated_set.pyx}}} was ok after I realised that
`__classcall_private__` was ignored by `cdef` class. It was not a
suggestion, but it would not be the first renamed function:
{{{
sage: import_statements(sum)
from sage.misc.functional import symbolic_sum
}}}
So, we go with commit dd72bfc instead of 3191690 ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6637#comment:52>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
