#6213: easy addition of an alias to eta product (trivial ticket to deal with)
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.0.1
Component: number theory | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
{{{
Hi David,
This is inconsistent:
sage: e =EtaProduct(3, {3:12, 1:-12})
sage: e.qexp(10) # but no q_expansion function
Everywhere else in Sage we write "q_expansion" and have qexp as an
alias. It thus took me a while to find e.qexp, since I expected
e.q_expansion. What do you think?
Agreed. I wrote most of that class during a lunch break at a conference
last summer, and at the time I didn't have much of a clue about Sage
conventions (as is probably clear to anyone reading the code). Please feel
free to change it!
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6213>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
