#15976: IntegerLattice class
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: linear algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Martin Albrecht | Reviewers: Daniel Krenn
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/15976 | ce5faa250fe5beacb9eb79b7e4b7a766ed5abff6
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vbraun):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
Please merge in the latest beta and resolve the doctest failurues
{{{
sage -t --long src/sage/modules/free_module_integer.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/modules/free_module_integer.py", line 437, in
sage.modules.free_module_integer.FreeModule_submodule_with_basis_integer.BKZ
Failed example:
L.LLL()
Expected:
100 x 100 dense matrix over Integer Ring
Got:
100 x 100 dense matrix over Integer Ring (use the '.str()' method to
see the entries)
}}}
On a related note, how is the doctest runtime on 100x100 matrices... is
this the smallest example that provides adequate test coverage?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15976#comment:60>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
