#15976: IntegerLattice class
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  malb               |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  linear algebra     |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Martin Albrecht    |    Reviewers:  Daniel Krenn
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/15976                |  4f6b44e9a1e3530409d4e9317e852a024093ee36
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by malb):

 Replying to [comment:68 tscrim]:
 > There's a couple of little things scattered throughout that I think
 should be fixed before this gets merged. For example, in the `LLL`
 definition, you have non-ascii characters where I think you should just
 use the latex equivalents.

 I disagree, using UTF-8 makes it a lot more readable and compact. Changing
 it to TeX would be a step backward IMHO.

 > The reference should be:
 > {{{
 > .. [Ref] blah on first line that needs continuing on
 >    the second line
 > }}}
 > (you have one space less and would be slightly surprised the doc builds
 and has well-formatted output).

 The documentation builds and - as far as I can tell - has well formated
 output. If you'd prefer it to be aligned for consistency, I'm not
 objecting.

 > You could likely benefit from raw string formatting:
 > {{{
 > def foo():
 >     r"""
 >     The r in front makes this a "raw" string, so the backslash isn't an
 >     escape character. So you can do things like this: `\ZZ` and
 `\alpha`.
 >     """
 >     pass
 > }}}

 I know this exists, but I find {{{`\\ZZ`}}} more straight-forward. I don't
 think it needs to be changed, but if you prefer it differently, feel free
 to go ahead.

 > Bring stuff up to python3 compliance.

 Python 3 compliance would be good :)

 > I can go through and do these things tomorrow morning if you don't mind
 the tweaks (and/or don't do it while I sleep `:P`).

 Thanks.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15976#comment:70>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to